http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/29/341-what-is-civil-conscription/ Irregular updates and articles on the situation in Greece, in English Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:36:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/29/341-what-is-civil-conscription/comment-page-1/#comment-12835 Counter-information bulletin, August 2010 « Contra Info Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:31:32 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2649#comment-12835 [...] 1 August, following the government’s civil conscription order and army vehicles roaming the country’s streets offering gas supplies, the lorry [...] [...] 1 August, following the government’s civil conscription order and army vehicles roaming the country’s streets offering gas supplies, the lorry [...]

]]> http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/29/341-what-is-civil-conscription/comment-page-1/#comment-12289 Akhilesh kumar Sun, 22 Aug 2010 06:36:13 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2649#comment-12289 Diploma civil engineer Diploma civil engineer

]]> http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/29/341-what-is-civil-conscription/comment-page-1/#comment-12029 sjerp Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:23:14 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2649#comment-12029 I do wonder why this site calls the current government 'socialist.' Rather it should be called social-democratic. A lot of socialists, including me, do not at all identify with the policies of the social-democrats of the past, say, 120 years. I think the difference should be emphasized because the regular media use it to pronounce a 'socialist'-liberal antogonism which does not really exist. Rather the radical left should put them on a heap and clarify our differences with them. I do wonder why this site calls the current government ‘socialist.’ Rather it should be called social-democratic. A lot of socialists, including me, do not at all identify with the policies of the social-democrats of the past, say, 120 years.
I think the difference should be emphasized because the regular media use it to pronounce a ‘socialist’-liberal antogonism which does not really exist. Rather the radical left should put them on a heap and clarify our differences with them.

]]>