Comments on: #339 | The ‘Sect of Revolutionaries’ claims the responsibility for the excecution of Socratis Giolias a week ago http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/ Irregular updates and articles on the situation in Greece, in English Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:37:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Thecychristi http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-17869 Thecychristi Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:14:10 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-17869 cheap <a href="http://designer-bags-on-sale.weebly.com/" / rel="nofollow">designer bags on sale</a> , for special offer <a href="http://expensive-handbags.weebly.com/" / rel="nofollow">expensive handbags</a> and check coupon code available cheap designer bags on sale , for special offer expensive handbags and check coupon code available

]]> By: INCUBUS http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-12139 INCUBUS Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:05:58 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-12139 Communique translated into english here: http://actforfreedomnow.blogspot.com/2010/08/sect-of-revolutionaries-claims.html Communique translated into english here:

http://actforfreedomnow.blogspot.com/2010/08/sect-of-revolutionaries-claims.html

]]> By: Sam http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-12135 Sam Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:47:28 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-12135 These idiots are definitly not maoists. In their texts there is no grain of marxist ideology. They are a kind of nihilistic anarchists. They hate the working class. Their ideology reminds me in some aspects of the conservative revolutionary movement in Germany in the Weimar Republic. In their communiqué they write: "“As for the financial crisis and the whining of society about the bleak future, we do not give a damn. We don't care about a world that protests the new unbearable economic measures without first having rebelled against the cheapness of the meaning of life inside the system; it deserves its fate. ... Today's urban guerillas must overcome the legacy of the socialist proletariat and proclaim as a revolutionary subject they themselves, their comrades and all those who actively deny the coup of power in our lives, giving a substantial advantage to life and not economic analysis.” These idiots are definitly not maoists. In their texts there is no grain of marxist ideology. They are a kind of nihilistic anarchists. They hate the working class. Their ideology reminds me in some aspects of the conservative revolutionary movement in Germany in the Weimar Republic. In their communiqué they write: ““As for the financial crisis and the whining of society about the bleak future, we do not give a damn. We don’t care about a world that protests the new unbearable economic measures without first having rebelled against the cheapness of the meaning of life inside the system; it deserves its fate. … Today’s urban guerillas must overcome the legacy of the socialist proletariat and proclaim as a revolutionary subject they themselves, their comrades and all those who actively deny the coup of power in our lives, giving a substantial advantage to life and not economic analysis.”

]]> By: INCUBUS http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-12101 INCUBUS Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:07:45 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-12101 Whatever. A small factual error... however, Sanguinetti was in the SI (See "On Terrorism"), and his critique is as valid now as it was then, so go blow it out your arse! Whatever. A small factual error… however, Sanguinetti was in the SI (See “On Terrorism”), and his critique is as valid now as it was then, so go blow it out your arse!

]]> By: basta@incubus/troll http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-12100 basta@incubus/troll Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:40:57 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-12100 so now we can prove ya're shit. H.J. Klein was never in RAF; he was a member of Revolutionary Cells so now we can prove ya’re shit. H.J. Klein was never in RAF; he was a member of Revolutionary Cells

]]> By: mmm http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-12094 mmm Mon, 02 Aug 2010 01:08:13 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-12094 Revolutionary Sect Communiqué: http://www.tanea.gr/default.asp?pid=2&ct=1&artid=4586575 If anyone wants to do a translation...Google Translate is pretty rough. Revolutionary Sect Communiqué: http://www.tanea.gr/default.asp?pid=2&ct=1&artid=4586575

If anyone wants to do a translation…Google Translate is pretty rough.

]]> By: INCUBUS http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-12077 INCUBUS Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:37:35 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-12077 If I am a troll and one who 'smears' then I am one in the tradition of Hans Joachim Klein (RAF)and Gianfranco Sanguinetti (SI), whom I quote here at length:- "In a parallel manner to the catastrophic or miraculous explanations of history, the spectacle reaches the point of no longer knowing whom it rules, no longer grasping the reality and the thoughts it must master urgently; and, as Machiavelli says, "where one knows least, one suspects most": the entire population, and all the young people in particular, become suspect in the eyes of power. At the same time if artificial terrorism claims to be *the only real phenomenom*, all spontaneous revolts, like those of Rome and Bologna in 1977, become according to this "police conception of history" a plot, artificially hatched and led by "occult forces" yet "quite identifiable- as Stalinists today still maintain. Everything that power does not forecast, because it has not orgnized it, therefore becomes a "plot" against it; on the other hand, artificial terrorism, being organized and directed by the masters of the spectacle, is a *real* and spontaneous phenomenom that these latter continually feign to fight, for the simple reason that *it is easier to defend oneself from a simulated enemy, than from a real enemy*. And for the real enemy, the proletariat, power would like to refuse it even the *status* of enemy: if workers declare themselves to be against this demented terrorism, the "they are with the State", if they are against the State, then "they are terrorists", that is to say enemies of the common good, *public enemies*. And against a public enemy, everything is permitted, everything is authorised." If I am a troll and one who ‘smears’ then I am one in the tradition of Hans Joachim Klein (RAF)and Gianfranco Sanguinetti (SI), whom I quote here at length:-
“In a parallel manner to the catastrophic or miraculous explanations of history, the spectacle reaches the point of no longer knowing whom it rules, no longer grasping the reality and the thoughts it must master urgently; and, as Machiavelli says, “where one knows least, one suspects most”: the entire population, and all the young people in particular, become suspect in the eyes of power. At the same time if artificial terrorism claims to be *the only real phenomenom*, all spontaneous revolts, like those of Rome and Bologna in 1977, become according to this “police conception of history” a plot, artificially hatched and led by “occult forces” yet “quite identifiable- as Stalinists today still maintain. Everything that power does not forecast, because it has not orgnized it, therefore becomes a “plot” against it; on the other hand, artificial terrorism, being organized and directed by the masters of the spectacle, is a *real* and spontaneous phenomenom that these latter continually feign to fight, for the simple reason that *it is easier to defend oneself from a simulated enemy, than from a real enemy*. And for the real enemy, the proletariat, power would like to refuse it even the *status* of enemy: if workers declare themselves to be against this demented terrorism, the “they are with the State”, if they are against the State, then “they are terrorists”, that is to say enemies of the common good, *public enemies*. And against a public enemy, everything is permitted, everything is authorised.”

]]> By: Johnny http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-12055 Johnny Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:45:09 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-12055 Silencing criticism by unresponsiveness to serve the evasion of accountability is tantamount a tactic of diversion copied straight out of the NWO handbook for, slavery, oppression & absolute rulership by psychological indoctrination. I am actually not much surprised, it would had impressed & startled me rather if you would had politely, sincerely & correctly accounted a decent logical contention against the imposed suspicion, of exploiting the public attention on the news updates from Greece for an ulterior private motive. Which is an imaginable, reasonable, legitimate, inquiry, when discerning the noticeable overabundant responses assigning your signature to just about any article published. Plus with consideration to the fact that more then a few people raised quite similar allegations by what I recall, literally ranging from you trolling the site, to smearing the movement at any chance you get. But your obvious impotent, arrogant & unauthentic to do right. Assumably too hypocritical to infer for your own, how you quintessentially lack, denounce & contradict in presence, theory & conduct, all the decorum, virtues & ideals, which according your general statements you proclaim as representative, defining & intrinsic to the type of modern social revolution as you ostensibly sympathize. Probably too absorbed in your complacent egotrip productively flaunting your intellectual hypernymy, (notably compensating on a contingent emotional, psychological, or social dysfunction), incapable to penetrate how your self-interested, non-philanthropic & exploitive demeanor especially personifies de facto the living proof in testifying versus the idealistic case that you sanctimoniously present in token disguised as the morally superior class struggle for equality. And therefore, to reverse the criteria by your own ethical standards against yourself, the revolution should foremost be directed to primarily get rid of discriminatory, asocial, narcissistic, nerds like you, transparently perverting the anarchistic revolution for own profiteering as you excel in. Silencing criticism by unresponsiveness to serve the evasion of accountability is tantamount a tactic of diversion copied straight out of the NWO handbook for, slavery, oppression & absolute rulership by psychological indoctrination.

I am actually not much surprised, it would had impressed & startled me rather if you would had politely, sincerely & correctly accounted a decent logical contention against the imposed suspicion, of exploiting the public attention on the news updates from Greece for an ulterior private motive. Which is an imaginable, reasonable, legitimate, inquiry, when discerning the noticeable overabundant responses assigning your signature to just about any article published. Plus with consideration to the fact that more then a few people raised quite similar allegations by what I recall, literally ranging from you trolling the site, to smearing the movement at any chance you get.

But your obvious impotent, arrogant & unauthentic to do right.

Assumably too hypocritical to infer for your own, how you quintessentially lack, denounce & contradict in presence, theory & conduct, all the decorum, virtues & ideals, which according your general statements you proclaim as representative, defining & intrinsic to the type of modern social revolution as you ostensibly sympathize. Probably too absorbed in your complacent egotrip productively flaunting your intellectual hypernymy, (notably compensating on a contingent emotional, psychological, or social dysfunction), incapable to penetrate how your self-interested, non-philanthropic & exploitive demeanor especially personifies de facto the living proof in testifying versus the idealistic case that you sanctimoniously present in token disguised as the morally superior class struggle for equality.

And therefore, to reverse the criteria by your own ethical standards against yourself, the revolution should foremost be directed to primarily get rid of discriminatory, asocial, narcissistic, nerds like you, transparently perverting the anarchistic revolution for own profiteering as you excel in.

]]> By: Faust http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-12047 Faust Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:59:32 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-12047 What the hell is your problem, you stupid reformists, with people determined to live revolution here and now, in their own terms. Why getting so incensed with individual action against the state? Do you honestly think the state needs an excuse in terrorism to press on with its slave-making agenda? Keep your damn hands off rioters, those maggots of you who act as if there exists an unofficial Party of Anarchism, to which everyone must adhere. There has been alot of stupid suggestions by your ilk of turning rioters to the police. Don't stoop to that level, or things will go nasty. It's one thing being stupid enough to wait interminably for the revolution to be debated in your foul little democratic charades and another to cannibalise those who are daring enough to not waste their lives expecting tyrrany to budge to prayers for freedom. And keep your mouth shut in front of audiences where police agents might lurk, eager to pick up innuendos about certain individuals or groups. What the hell is your problem, you stupid reformists, with people determined to live revolution here and now, in their own terms. Why getting so incensed with individual action against the state? Do you honestly think the state needs an excuse in terrorism to press on with its slave-making agenda?

Keep your damn hands off rioters, those maggots of you who act as if there exists an unofficial Party of Anarchism, to which everyone must adhere. There has been alot of stupid suggestions by your ilk of turning rioters to the police. Don’t stoop to that level, or things will go nasty. It’s one thing being stupid enough to wait interminably for the revolution to be debated in your foul little democratic charades and another to cannibalise those who are daring enough to not waste their lives expecting tyrrany to budge to prayers for freedom. And keep your mouth shut in front of audiences where police agents might lurk, eager to pick up innuendos about certain individuals or groups.

]]> By: INCUBUS http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/2010/07/28/339-the-sect-of-revolutionaries-claim-the-responsibility-for-the-excecution-of-socratis-giolias-a-week-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-12042 INCUBUS Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:28:28 +0000 http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/?p=2633#comment-12042 Yeah, etc. Yeah, etc.

]]>